Category: Research

  • Your Local Urban Heat Island Map as a Resource for Action and Accountability

    Your Local Urban Heat Island Map as a Resource for Action and Accountability

    2023 will likely be one of the hottest years on record after our extreme summer, including record-setting temperatures in June and July (Scientific American). As we enjoy the fall weather and find reprieve from prior scorching highs, it’s an important time to reflect on the leading weather-related killer in the U.S.: heat (EPA). But the burden of heat—and the associated health impacts and high costs of air conditioning—is not equally felt. Heat exposure is determined by where we work and live. As a group, Latinos face outsized heat risk, both because of broader employment patterns and because they are more likely to live in urban heat islands. Heat thus poses an outsized threat to the wellness and financial stability of Latino families all over the country (Union of Concerned Scientists). We, the authors, are committed to working, learning, and living environments in which Latinos feel included, welcomed, and safe from high temperatures. Read on to find out how you can help make that a reality!

    We (the authors) are two mixed race Latinas living in Washington County, Oregon, part of the larger Portland metro area. Like many other Pacific Northwest residents, we were forced by the 2021 “heat dome” to recognize and confront the realities of a hotter climate (National Academies). In order to respond properly to the increasing heat risk, we need to collect data, adapt to the changing circumstances, and create equitable solutions that account for the additional heat burden borne by Latinos in our rapidly changing climate.

    Heat poses a higher risk to Latinos as a group for a couple of reasons. For one, many Latinos work jobs which keep them outdoors, even during hot temperatures. Latinos are disproportionately represented in the agricultural, construction, and utility workforces (McKinsey & Company). For people who work outdoors, the increasingly severe and frequent heat waves in the U.S. not only pose increased physical risks but also financial risks because they reduce the number of safe workdays per year.

    For another, racial minorities are more likely than white community members to live in urban areas. Latinos, in particular, are a highly urbanized population (Pew Research Center) and are more likely to live in low-income and inner-city neighborhoods with less vegetation and green space (Hispanic Action Fund). As thoughtfully covered by a prior GreenLatinos blogpost, these urbanized areas experience higher temperatures than their suburban and rural surroundings, in part because pavement, brick, and steel absorb, retain, and re-radiate heat (NASA). Dense urban areas can experience afternoon temperatures that are as much as 20°F warmer than their suburban or rural surroundings (NIHHIS). These high temperatures in urban heat islands are dangerous, threatening human health, contributing to energy poverty, and even undermining academic success (The Hill; Scientific American).

    We still have a lot to learn about exactly how severe the air temperature differential is in urban heat islands. Luckily, this summer, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and CAPA Strategies invited local residents in over a dozen U.S. cities/counties (and Santiago, Chile) to map the hottest parts of their communities (NOAA). These resident “street scientists” traveled through their neighborhoods on one of the hottest days of the year with a heat sensor mounted on their car. The sensors recorded temperature, humidity, location, and time every second in order to understand how the human-built environment alters local temperatures. This data is then transformed into a high-resolution map that identifies the hottest and coolest places across neighborhoods (New York City example below). These “heat maps” of U.S. communities will be released throughout the next few months, which is where GreenLatinos’ members and allies come in.

    C:Usersmont4122AppDataLocalMicrosoftWindowsINetCacheContent.MSOAA72B0AD.tmp

    [Image 1. Caption: NOAA worked with resident “street scientists” to map urban heat islands in multiple cities and counties in 14 states this summer and in one international city, Santiago, Chile. Image credit: NOAA]

    The heat maps can and should inform hyper-local strategies to keep people safe. With Latino populations bearing an unequal exposure burden as the planet heats up due to climate change, solutions must be focused on protecting those most impacted. Here we offer a few examples. The maps can be used to identify the best location for a new public transit shelter or to prompt the residents of the hottest neighborhoods to check in on the most vulnerable. Find your local report and confirm your policy leaders have a copy; share the tool and insist that they use it. Urge your city councilors to apply the data to local zoning and investments decisions. Advise your state representative to use the tool to inform bills and funding priorities. Advocate for your park leaders to use the maps to increase shade canopy in the hottest neighborhoods.

    https://citylimits.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/heat-map-1-771x617.jpg

    [Image 2. Caption: New York City-based researchers and volunteers collected data to document neighborhood temperatures. Image Credit: CAPA Strategies.]

    This work on heat dangers is important to the Latinidad community as a whole, and is especially so to the authors. Dr. Adelle Monteblanco is an Assistant Professor of Public Health at Pacific University (Forest Grove, Oregon) who focuses her research on vulnerable populations like pregnant people who may struggle to regulate their body temperature over prolonged heat exposure. Her work is increasingly relevant in a changing climate, for pregnant Latinas are already at greater risk for gestational diabetes and pregnancy-related blood pressure disorders (Salud); a hotter climate and more heat risk will create more consequences for Latinas’ maternal health. Felicita Monteblanco, Board Director at Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation (THPRD) (Beaverton, OR), celebrates the ways urban parks cool the air and mitigate the impact of the urban heat island effect; she and the THPRD team are eager to use the heat mapping data collected to shape their decision making, including the location of future parks.

    We are invested in the long-term sustainability of our region and the health of its residents, just as you are invested in yours. Latines are a crucial part of the social, political, and economic fabric of our country, yet they carry a disproportionate heat burden. If your community is one of the many that were heat mapped this summer (Image 1), we hope you’ll engage by strategizing local solutions to reduce heat exposure and holding leaders accountable to equitable interventions. Latinx communities would benefit greatly from additional resources, including the creation of more shade from city planning projects, additional cooling centers, and active participation in government decision-making.

    Author Bio

    Dr. Adelle Monteblanco is an Assistant Professor of Public Health at Pacific University (Forest Grove, OR) where she teaches courses on environmental health and the built environment. Felicita Monteblanco is the Public Affairs Manager at Northwest Health Foundation (Portland, OR) and serves on the Board of Directors for Tualatin Hills Park and Recreation District (Beaverton, OR).

    Image 3. Caption: Felicita and Adelle at a THPRD park. February 2023. Image credit: Felicita Monteblanco

  • NEW ANALYSIS: 6 Ways States Can Lead on Racial and Economic Equity in EV Infrastructure Development

    NEW ANALYSIS: 6 Ways States Can Lead on Racial and Economic Equity in EV Infrastructure Development

    Today, Evergreen Action, Atlas Public Policy, EVHybridNoire and GreenLatinos released a first-of-its-kind report examining the implementation of Justice40 goals in early National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program Plans.

    Charging Toward Justice: How States Can Lead on Racial and Economic Equity through the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Program, analyzes how states incorporated equity and Justice40 principles in their initial NEVI implementation plans, and is designed to inform policymakers ahead of the Federal Highway Administration’s August 1 deadline for states to submit revised plans to the federal government. NEVI is one of the first Justice40-covered programs to be implemented nationwide and provides an early opportunity to evaluate the critical work that the Biden administration and states need to do in order to ensure that 40 percent of the benefits of certain federal programs flow to disadvantaged communities.

    The recommendations included in the report for states’ revised plans were informed by both an analysis of state NEVI plans as well as robust national and local stakeholder interviews. The analysis finds that states varied considerably in how they prioritized equity and public engagement in developing their initial state NEVI plans. Public engagement emerged as a major opportunity for improvement in establishing meaningful partnerships with disadvantaged communities and allowing community members to advocate for themselves in how NEVI can be most beneficial.

    The new analysis identifies six strategies for states to both improve public engagement and maximize tangible benefits to disadvantaged communities going forward:

    1. Expand engagement strategies targeted specifically to reach disadvantaged communities, including widening reach on social media, email lists, local media, and meetings including communities of color and tribal communities.

    2. Enhance the accessibility of educational material to better reflect local community needs and contexts through expanding translations to incorporate all local languages and raising awareness in disadvantaged communities of state and federal resources available to boost EV adoption.

    3. Define Justice40 benefits through engagement with community members and ensure there are opportunities for feedback as NEVI is implemented.

    4. Build agency capacity for subsequent NEVI plans, train staff to leverage additional federal funds, and proactively involve community-based organizations.

    5. Conduct a fully public and documented engagement process to ensure transparency and build community partnership and trust. States can also strengthen their plans by considering any safety concerns in the citing of charging infrastructure in particular locations.

    6. Broaden the equity lens with complementary and comprehensive policies. For example, state incentive programs for zero emission transportation can help focus additional resources in and around disadvantaged communities. EV regulatory design and incentives, corporate EV sales strategies, and infrastructure design should all be approached comprehensively.

    Evaluating the efficacy of programs through an equity and Justice40 lens early and often is crucial for making adjustments. It’s also critical that the Biden administration, informed by this analysis and others, continue to refine and strengthen its guidance for states across all Justice40 programs. Justice40 considerations are especially important for transportation programs like NEVI, given the disproportionate pollution burden faced by disadvantaged communities and the harmful history of transportation investments in the US.

    “Equity must be a central pillar in the development of a nation-wide, public EV charging network. The analysis in this report shows that in just six months since NEVI was implemented, states have made significant progress towards realizing the vision ofJustice40—but there is still a ways to go,” said Rachel Patterson, Evergreen Action deputy policy director. “Accomplishing Justice40 standards in the NEVI program requires a collaboration between both state policymakers and the federal government as well as the people actually working and living in disadvantaged communities. In this moment, there is an incredible opportunity to create equitable, clean transportation from the ground up. We hope that this report can provide important lessons and tools for states as they move into the next stage of the NEVI implementation process.”

    “Underserved communities have historically been excluded from transportation decisions, leading to decades of cultural, social, and economic impairment. Through the $5 billion dollar NEVI program, we now have the chance to avoid repeating history’s mistakes,” said Moe Khatib, policy associate at Atlas Public Policy. “In our analysis, we found that in some cases, a disconnect exists between planners and communities. Agencies should use this opportunity to develop meaningful relationships with their communities, define local benefits, and consistently and thoroughly provide avenues for engagement throughout the five-year program period and beyond.”

    “As EV charging networks are built up, it’s crucial that states center equity and prioritize historically marginalized and underserved communities,” said Andrea Marpillero-Colomina, sustainable communities program director at GreenLatinos. “We are in uncharted territory as this new infrastructure is built out – making the NEVI program effective and accessible will require conscious policy decision-making that reflects and responds to community needs. This report highlights replicable best practices and sheds light on areas where work still needs to be done to achieve Justice40 benchmarks. We hope this research will inform states as they seek to create the strongest possible NEVI implementation plans and build the crucial infrastructure needed to achieve an equitable transportation future for all communities.”

    “We are witnessing transformational investments to accelerate equitable electrification investments, an area that is unfamiliar to many state transportation leaders.  As a result, this report fills a significant gap in knowledge and serves as a critical resource for states as they navigate NEVI Implementation,” said Dr. Shelley Francis, Co-Founder and Director at EVHybridNoire

    For more unique state approaches to public engagement and equitable program implementation, including specific best practices, read the full report here.